Press Release

CALD Executive Committee Statement: Responding to Humanitarian Crises – Upholding the Rule of Law and Respect for Human Rights

By | Press Release

 The Council of Australian Law Deans (CALD) is the peak body representing Australia’s 39 university law schools, and the CALD Executive Committee is comprised of eight Australian law deans. This statement in response to contemporary humanitarian crises has been drafted and endorsed by the members of the CALD Executive Committee as well as the CALD members listed below. 

A public trust is placed upon the shoulders of Australian law schools to educate and inspire the next generation of legal minds. Legal scholars and law students are called upon to wrestle with ideals that are ‘fundamental’ to the legitimacy of legal orders including foremost upholding the rule of law and respect for human rights. We teach law students that the definitions and scope of these ideals are never beyond contestation, subject to qualifications, limitations, and reservations. While contestation is to be expected, disputes should be resolved peacefully where possible or fought respectfully with legal rules in open forums and tribunals, rather than with lethal weapons on battlefields. 

Upholding the rule of law and respect for human rights are critical to conferring legitimacy on our systems of governance, as well as holding out the prospect that those who abuse power and act unlawfully and without justification may be held ultimately accountable. Fidelity to these ideals serves to prevent abuses of power within both domestic and international legal orders. In recent months, the humanitarian crisis in Europe has witnessed these twin commitments to legality and human rights being placed under grave threat. 

The law schools of Australia form part of the global and local communities they serve. The signatories to this statement first express their deep concern for the human impacts on civilian populations caused by the armed conflict continuing to rage in Ukraine. International laws have been invoked, challenged and infringed, and untold human rights abused. Casting aside respect for international law and legal institutions for resolving disputes – whether bearing on contentious issues of territorial sovereignty and self-determination – is a perilous route that subverts the rule of law and human rights domestically and internationally. 

Humanitarian crises are not solely caused by armed conflict. Over recent weeks, Australia has been adversely affected by extreme weather events, which have wreaked destruction and disruption on countless lives, property and communities. Following catastrophic bushfires in 2019-20, the current floods demand immediate humanitarian responses, and also underscore the key role of new national laws enacted for the purpose of more effectively coordinating natural disaster responses at the local, state and national level. 

The signatories to this statement join those leading scholars and other concerned members of law schools calling for respect of international norms and institutions, and renewed efforts 

by all nations to cease violent conflict and to avert, or as a minimum, mitigate the effects of humanitarian crises. To that end, the signatories to this statement express the following: 

  • • We affirm our solidarity and deep concern for those whose lives have been disrupted and communities displaced by the turmoil now engulfing parts of Eastern and Central Europe. 
  • • Law and legal institutions at all levels have a vital role in averting and responding to humanitarian crises, as well as creating conditions for effective reconstruction. 
  • • Averting humanitarian crises, whether related to rising geopolitical global rivalries or the climate emergency, requires co-ordinated action at the local, national and global levels. 
  • • Legal scholars play an important role in assisting the community to better understand the legal and constitutional implications of these crises, mindful of proper bounds of their professional expertise, and rights and duties associated with academic freedom on campus. 

The signatories to this statement recognise that the legal academic community, in speaking up against injustice and abuses of power whether at the local or international level, will not always be in a popular position among political or civil society circles. To be ‘frank and fearless’ in defence of legal ideas and human rights sometimes comes at a personal and professional cost. 

The signatories to this statement join those leading scholars and concerned members of law schools calling for respect of international norms and institutions, and renewed efforts by all nations to cease violent conflict and avert humanitarian catastrophe. 

The CALD Executive is committed to advancing and promoting open and respectful debate and discussion on matters of legal concern both local and global. 


CALD Executive Committee: 

Professor Tania Sourdin (CALD Co-Chair), The University of Newcastle 

Professor Nick James (CALD Co-Chair), Bond University 

Professor Natalie Skead (Deputy Chair), The University of Western Australia 

Professor Simon Bronitt (CALD Treasurer), The University of Sydney 

Professor Tania Leiman (Vice-Chair Legal Education), Flinders University 

Professor Sally Wheeler OBE (Vice-Chair Legal Research), Australian National University 

Professor Pip Nicholson (Vice-Chair International Matters), The University of Melbourne 

Professor Jenni Lightowlers (Vice-Chair Standards, Accreditation and the Legal Profession), Deakin University 

Australian Law Deans: 

Professor Trish Mundy, Dean of Law, University of Wollongong 

Professor Michael Quinlan, National Head of School, Law and Business, University of Notre Dame Australia 

Professor Fiona Kelly, Dean, School of Law, La Trobe University 

Professor Patrick Keyzer, Dean of Law, Australian Catholic University 

Assoc. Professor Alan Berman, Dean of Law, Charles Darwin University 

Professor Michael A. Adams FAAL, Head of School, UNE Law School, University of New England 

Professor Reid Mortensen, Head of School, School of Law and Justice, University of Southern Queensland 

Professor Anita Stuhmcke, Dean of Law, University of Technology Sydney 

Professor Therese Wilson, Dean of Law, Griffith Law School, Griffith University 

Associate Professor Joshua Aston, Associate Dean of Law, School of Business and Law, Edith Cowan University 

Professor Andrew Lynch, Dean of Law and Justice, University of NSW Sydney 

Professor Jay Sanderson, Head of School, School of Law and Society, University of the Sunshine Coast 

Professor Vicki Waye, Dean of Law, University of South Australia 

Professor Michael Stuckey, Dean of Law, University of Tasmania 

Ms Sonia Walker, Head of Law and Criminology, Murdoch University 

Professor Tania Leiman, Dean of Law, Flinders University 

Professor Lise Barry, Dean of Law, Macquarie University 

Associate Professor Alison Gerard, Head, Canberra Law School, University of Canberra 

Professor Anna Cody, Dean of Law, Western Sydney University 

Professor Bryan Horrigan, Dean of Law, Monash University 

Professor Robert Cunningham, Dean of Law, Curtin University 

Dr Jamie Fellow, Head of Law, James Cook University 

Professor Simon Bronitt, Head and Dean, Sydney Law School, University of Sydney 

CALD Statement on the High Court’s investigation into sexual harassment

By | Press Release

The Council of Australian Law Deans notes the statement issued by The Hon. Susan Kiefel AC, Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia on 22 June 2020.  The Council welcomes the steps the Chief Justice and the Court have adopted to support associates working at the Court.  These steps should enable young law graduates, seeking the opportunity to work at the High Court, to be confident that the Court will be a safe and respectful work environment.  The Council agrees with the Chief Justice that sexual harassment has no place in any workplace, and encourages all within the legal profession to ensure that safe workplaces are provided.


Professor Lesley Hitchens GAICD
Chair, Council of Australian Law Deans

25 June 2020




For media inquiries, contact the CALD Executive Coordinator at or 0438 422 919.

The Council of Australian Deans is the peak body for all Australian university law schools. The Deans of all Australian law schools are members of the Council.

CALD Statement on the Australian Government’s proposed changes to the fee structure for legal education

By | Press Release

The Council of Australian Law Deans is deeply concerned about the Government’s proposed changes to Higher Education funding announced on 19 June 2020.  The changes will impact significantly on the cost of undergraduate legal education in public universities.  Under the proposed changes the Government will reduce its contribution to legal education from $2,237 to $1,100, whilst the student contribution will increase by 28%, from $11,355 to $14,500 for a student place.

The significant increase in student fees puts at serious risk access to legal education for young people who are socially and economically disadvantaged, who come from culturally diverse backgrounds, and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians.  Diversity is crucial for the development and operation of law.  Diversity improves understanding of the operation of the rule of law and the legal justice system for those who have not traditionally had a voice.  Increasing the cost of legal education increases the barriers for those who have the potential to enrich the legal profession and improve legal outcomes.  It will narrow the range of representation within the profession.

The Council cautions against assumptions that legal employment is highly paid, thereby justifying higher fees.  Legal practice occupies a broad spectrum of practice both in size, and practice type.  A solicitor’s income in a large commercial firm is not a benchmark for incomes in other areas of practice.  And a significant proportion of law graduates do not enter the legal profession at all.

The Council questions the reasoning of the Government in its proposed restructure.  The Minister for Education, the Hon. Dan Tehan MP, stated in his speech to the National Press Club that the Government and student contributions would address the misalignment between the contribution cost and the cost of teaching a degree.  The changes across the disciplines do not align with this objective, and do not explain why the law student contribution increases by 28%.  The Minister advises students to reduce the cost of their degree by “embracing diversity” and “not think about their education as a siloed degree”.  Australian law students have long embraced diversity by studying a combined or double degree, enhancing each degree by the knowledge and skills of the other.  The double degree is a feature unique to Australian higher education and conveys a clear advantage in a global employment market.  Many double degree graduates pursue careers outside the legal profession, taking advantage of their legal education to enhance their expertise in other fields.  However, the proposed fee changes will make undertaking a double degree more challenging for students wanting to include law in their program.

The Government’s proposed changes send a signal that undervalues legal knowledge and skills, and the humanities and social sciences more broadly.  An important component of legal education is an emphasis on employability skills.  Communication skills, expertise in analytical and problem-solving, critical thinking and an ability to synthesise complex information are essential skills for practising lawyers and those pursuing graduate employment in other areas of business and political life.  Employment rates for law demonstrate the ongoing recognition of the value of a law degree.  86.8% of undergraduate law students had employment within four months of completing their degree, consistent with national averages (Graduate Outcomes Survey, 2019).

The Council recognises the importance of the STEM disciplines and the need to support STEM.  However, the Council is disappointed that this should occur at the expense of the humanities and social sciences.  Arbitrary funding decisions to drive employment outcomes neglects the broader role all disciplines have to enrich the nation and its citizens beyond the economic.  Moreover, the approach lacks foresight.  Australia faces complex challenges including a changing demographic, uncertainly about its international relationships, and the impact of technology.  These challenges will not be solved by single disciplinary approaches; they require multidisciplinary insight whereby disciplinary experts across STEM, the humanities, and the social sciences bring together their knowledge and skills to create technical solutions that are balanced by ethical and equitable considerations.

The Council would welcome an opportunity to consider these changes with the Government to ensure that they do not put at risk access to legal education and the role of legal education in the broader community.


Professor Lesley Hitchens GAICD
Chair, Council of Australian Law Deans

22 June 2020


For media inquiries, contact the CALD Executive Coordinator at or 0438 422 919.